Anchor: #i1107984

Section 11: Time of Concentration

Time of concentration (tc) is the time required for the entire watershed to contribute to runoff at the point of interest for hydraulic design; this is calculated as the time for runoff to flow from the most hydraulically remote point of the drainage area to the point under investigation. There may be a number of possible paths to consider in determining the longest travel time. The designer must identify the flow path along which the longest travel time is likely to occur.

When runoff is computed using the rational method, tc is the appropriate storm duration and in turn determines the appropriate precipitation intensity for use in the rational method equation.

When runoff is computed using the hydrograph method, tc is used to compute rainfall-runoff parameters for the watershed. tc is also used as an input to define the appropriate storm duration.

When applicable, the Kerby-Kirpich method (Roussel et al. 2005) is to be used for estimating tc. The National Resources Conservation Service (1986) method is also commonly used. Both of these methods estimate tc as the sum of travel times for discrete flow regimes.

Anchor: #i1108009

Kerby-Kirpich Method

Roussel et al. 2005 conclude that, in general, Kirpich-inclusive approaches, [and particularly] the Kerby-Kirpich approach, for estimating watershed time of concentration are preferable. The Kerby-Kirpich approach requires comparatively few input parameters, is straightforward to apply, and produces readily interpretable results. The Kerby-Kirpich approach produces time of concentration estimates consistent with watershed time values independently derived from real-world storms and runoff hydrographs. Similar to other methods for calculation of tc, the total time of concentration is obtained by adding the overland flow time (Kerby) and the channel flow time (Kirpich):

Anchor: #EGKLKMJL

Equation 4-13.

Where:

tov = overland flow time

tch = channel flow time

The Kerby-Kirpich method for estimating tc is applicable to watersheds ranging from 0.25 square miles to 150 square miles, main channel lengths between 1 and 50 miles, and main channel slopes between 0.002 and 0.02 (ft/ft) (Roussel et al. 2005).

Main channel slope is computed as the change in elevation from the watershed divide to the watershed outlet divided by the curvilinear distance of the main channel (primary flow path) between the watershed divide and the outlet.

No watersheds with low topographic slopes are available in the underlying database. Therefore, the guidance described here is not applicable to watersheds with limited topographic slope. Such watersheds are predominant in the High Plains and Coastal Regions of Texas.

Anchor: #i1108172

The Kerby Method

For small watersheds where overland flow is an important component of overall travel time, the Kerby method can be used. The Kerby equation is

Anchor: #LHNIMKFH

Equation 4-14.

Where:

In the development of the Kerby equation, the length of overland flow was as much as about 1,200 feet (366 meters). Hence, this length is considered an upper limit and shorter values in practice generally are expected. The dimensionless retardance coefficient used is similar in concept to the well-known Manning's roughness coefficient; however, for a given type of surface, the retardance coefficient for overland flow will be considerably larger than for open-channel flow. Typical values for the retardance coefficient are listed in Table 4-5.

Anchor: #i1080974Table 4-5: Kerby Equation Retardance Coefficient Values

Generalized terrain description

Dimensionless retardance coefficient (N)

Pavement

0.02

Smooth, bare, packed soil

0.10

Poor grass, cultivated row crops, or moderately rough packed surfaces

0.20

Pasture, average grass

0.40

Deciduous forest

0.60

Dense grass, coniferous forest, or deciduous forest with deep litter

0.80


Anchor: #i1108228

The Kirpich Method

For channel-flow component of runoff, the Kirpich equation is:

Equation 4-15.

Where:

Anchor: #i1108420

Application of the Kerby-Kirpich Method

An example (shown below) illustrating application of the Kerby-Kirpich method is informative. For example, suppose a hydraulic design is needed to convey runoff from a small watershed with a drainage area of 0.5 square miles. On the basis of field examination and topographic maps, the length of the main channel from the watershed outlet (the design point) to the watershed divide is 5,280 feet. Elevation of the watershed at the outlet is 700 feet. From a topographic map, elevation along the main channel at the watershed divide is estimated to be 750 feet. The analyst assumes that overland flow will have an appreciable contribution to the time of concentration for the watershed. The analyst estimates that the length of overland flow is about 500 feet and that the slope for the overland-flow component is 2 percent (S = 0.02). The area representing overland flow is average grass (N = 0.40). For the overland-flow tc, the analyst applies the Kerby equation,

from which tov is about 25 minutes. For the channel tch, the analyst applies the Kirpich equation, but first dimensionless main-channel slope is required,

or about 1 percent. The value for slope and the channel length are used in the Kirpich equation,

from which tch is about 32 minutes. Because the overland flow tov is used for this watershed, the subtraction of the overland flow length from the overall main-channel length (watershed divide to outlet) is necessary and reflected in the calculation. Adding the overland flow and channel flow components of gives a watershed of about 57 minutes. Finally, as a quick check, the analyst can evaluate the tc by using an ad hoc method representing tc, in hours, as the square root of drainage area, in square miles. For the example, the square root of the drainage area yields a tc estimate of about 0.71 hours or about 42 minutes, which is reasonably close to 57 minutes. However, 57 minutes is preferable. This example is shown in Figure 4-7.

Example application of Kerby-Kirpich method (click in image to see full-size image) Anchor: #JUFJMJFJgrtop

Figure 4-7. Example application of Kerby-Kirpich method

Anchor: #i1108490

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Method for Estimating tc

The NRCS method for estimating tc is applicable for small watersheds, in which the majority of flow is overland flow such that timing of the peak flow is not significantly affected by the contribution flow routed through underground storm drain systems. With the NRCS method:

Anchor: #KHUEHLEJ

Equation 4-16.

Where:

NRCS 1986 provides the following descriptions of these flow components:

Sheet flow is flow over plane surfaces, usually occurring in the headwater of streams. With sheet flow, the friction value is an effective roughness coefficient that includes the effect of raindrop impact; drag over the plane surface; obstacles such as litter, crop ridges, and rocks; and erosion and transportation of sediment.

After a maximum of 300 ft, sheet flow usually becomes shallow concentrated flow.

Open channels are assumed to begin where surveyed cross section information has been obtained, where channels are visible on aerial photographs, or where blue lines (indicating streams) appear on USGS quadrangle sheets.

For open channel flow, consider the uniform flow velocity based on bank-full flow conditions. That is, the main channel is flowing full without flow in the overbanks. This assumption avoids the significant iteration associated with rainfall intensity or discharges (because rainfall intensity and discharge are dependent on time of concentration).

For conduit flow, in a proposed storm drain system, compute the velocity at uniform depth based on the computed discharge at the upstream. Otherwise, if the conduit is in existence, determine full capacity flow in the conduit, and determine the velocity at capacity flow. You may need to compare this velocity later with the velocity calculated during conduit analysis. If there is a significant difference and the conduit is a relatively large component of the total travel path, recompute the time of concentration using the latter velocity estimate.

Anchor: #i1108551

Sheet Flow Time Calculation

Sheet flow travel time is computed as:

Anchor: #QFGJHJIL

Equation 4-17.

Where:

Anchor: #i1080998Table 4-6: Overland Flow Roughness Coefficients for Use in NRCS Method in Calculating Sheet Flow Travel Time (Not Manning’s Roughness Coefficient) (NRCS 1986)

Surface description

nol

Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt, gravel, or bare soil)

0.011

Fallow (no residue)

0.05

Cultivated soils:

Residue %

0.06

 

Residue cover > 20%

0.17

Grass:

Short grass prairie

0.15

 

Dense grasses

0.24

 

Bermuda

0.41

Range (natural):

 

0.13

Woods:

Light underbrush

0.40

 

Dense underbrush

0.80


Anchor: #i1108603

Shallow Concentrated Flow

Shallow concentrated flow travel time is computed as:

Anchor: #KLNHGEEH

Equation 4-18.

Where:

Anchor: #i1108650

Channel Flow

Channel flow travel time is computed by dividing the channel distance by the flow rate obtained from Manning’s equation. This can be written as:

Anchor: #KLJGKFKK

Equation 4-19.

Where:

    Anchor: #GFNLLFIE
  • tch = channel flow time (hr.)
    • Anchor: #EHGLJELL
  • Lch = channel flow length (ft)
    • Anchor: #NIKEEKFL
  • Sch = channel flow slope (ft/ft)
    • Anchor: #MGFKNMKH
  • n = Manning’s roughness coefficient
    • Anchor: #OENKHKFL
  • R = channel hydraulic radius (ft), and is equal to , where: a = cross sectional area (ft2) and pw = wetted perimeter (ft), consider the uniform flow velocity based on bank-full flow conditions. That is, the main channel is flowing full without flow in the overbanks. This assumption avoids the significant iteration associated with other methods that employ rainfall intensity or discharges (because rainfall intensity and discharge are dependent on time of concentration).
Anchor: #i1152390

Manning’s Roughness Coefficient Values

Manning’s roughness coefficients are used to calculate flows using Manning’s equation. Values from American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 1992, FHWA 2001, and Chow 1959 are reproduced in Table 4-7, Table 4-8, and Table 4-9.

Anchor: #i1081045Table 4-7: Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Open Channels

Type of channel

Manning’s n

A. Natural streams

1. Minor streams (top width at flood stage < 100 ft)

 a. Clean, straight, full, no rifts or deep pools

0.025-0.033

 b. Same as a, but more stones and weeds

0.030-0.040

 c. Clean, winding, some pools and shoals

0.033-0.045

 d. Same as c, but some weeds and stones

0.035-0.050

 e. Same as d, lower stages, more ineffective

0.040-0.055

 f. Same as d, more stones

0.045-0.060

 g. Sluggish reaches, weedy, deep pools

0.050-0.080

 h. Very weedy, heavy stand of timber and underbrush

0.075-0.150

 i. Mountain streams with gravel and cobbles, few boulders on bottom

0.030-0.050

 j. Mountain streams with cobbles and large boulders on bottom

0.040-0.070

2. Floodplains

 a. Pasture, no brush, short grass

0.025-0.035

 b. Pasture, no brush, high grass

0.030-0.050

 c. Cultivated areas, no crop

0.020-0.040

 d. Cultivated areas, mature row crops

0.025-0.045

 e. Cultivated areas, mature field crops

0.030-0.050

 f. Scattered brush, heavy weeds

0.035-0.070

 g. Light brush and trees in winter

0.035-0.060

 h. Light brush and trees in summer

0.040-0.080

 i. Medium to dense brush in winter

0.045-0.110

 j. Medium to dense brush in summer

0.070-0.160

 k. Trees, dense willows summer, straight

0.110-0.200

 l. Trees, cleared land with tree stumps, no sprouts

0.030-0.050

 m. Trees, cleared land with tree stumps, with sprouts

0.050-0.080

 n. Trees, heavy stand of timber, few down trees, flood stage below branches

0.080-0.120

 o. Trees, heavy stand of timber, few down trees, flood stage reaching branches

0.100-0.160

3. Major streams (top width at flood stage > 100 ft)

 a. Regular section with no boulders or brush

0.025-0.060

 b. Irregular rough section

0.035-0.100

B. Excavated or dredged channels

1. Earth, straight and uniform

 a. Clean, recently completed

0.016-0.020

 b. Clean, after weathering

0.018-0.025

 c. Gravel, uniform section, clean

0.022-0.030

 d. With short grass, few weeds

0.022-0.033

2. Earth, winding and sluggish

 a. No vegetation

0.023-0.030

 b. Grass, some weeds

0.025-0.033

 c. Deep weeds or aquatic plants in deep channels

0.030-0.040

 d. Earth bottom and rubble sides

0.028-0.035

 e. Stony bottom and weedy banks

0.025-0.040

 f. Cobble bottom and clean sides

0.030-0.050

 g. Winding, sluggish, stony bottom, weedy banks

0.025-0.040

 h. Dense weeds as high as flow depth

0.050-0.120

3. Dragline-excavated or dredged

 a. No vegetation

0.025-0.033

 b. Light brush on banks

0.035-0.060

4. Rock cuts

 a. Smooth and uniform

0.025-0.040

 b. Jagged and irregular

0.035-0.050

5. Unmaintained channels

 a. Dense weeds, high as flow depth

0.050-0.120

 b. Clean bottom, brush on sides

0.040-0.080

 c. Clean bottom, brush on sides, highest stage

0.045-0.110

 d. Dense brush, high stage

0.080-0.140

C. Lined channels

1. Asphalt

0.013-0.016

2. Brick (in cement mortar)

0.012-0.018

3. Concrete

 

 a. Trowel finish

0.011-0.015

 b. Float finish

0.013-0.016

 c. Unfinished

0.014-0.020

 d. Gunite, regular

0.016-0.023

 e. Gunite, wavy

0.018-0.025

4. Riprap (n-value depends on rock size)

0.020-0.035

5. Vegetal lining

0.030-0.500


Anchor: #i1081398Table 4-8: Manning’s Coefficients for Streets and Gutters

Type of gutter or pavement

Manning’s n

Concrete gutter, troweled finish

0.012

Asphalt pavement: smooth texture

0.013

Asphalt pavement: rough texture

0.016

Concrete gutter with asphalt pavement: smooth texture

0.013

Concrete gutter with asphalt pavement: rough texture

0.015

Concrete pavement: float finish

0.014

Concrete pavement: broom finish

0.016

Table 4-8 note: For gutters with small slope or where sediment may accumulate, increase n values by 0.02 (USDOT, FHWA 2001).



Anchor: #i1081431Table 4-9: Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Closed Conduits (ASCE 1982, FHWA 2001)

Material

Manning’s n

Asbestos-cement pipe

0.011-0.015

Brick

0.013-0.017

Cast iron pipe

 

 

Cement-lined & seal coated

0.011-0.015

Concrete (monolithic)

 

 

Smooth forms

0.012-0.014

 

Rough forms

0.015-0.017

 

Concrete pipe

0.011-0.015

 

Box (smooth)

0.012-0.015

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (2-1/2 in. x 1/2 in. corrugations)

 

 

Plain

0.022-0.026

 

Paved invert

0.018-0.022

 

Spun asphalt lined

0.011-0.015

 

Plastic pipe (smooth)

0.011-0.015

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (2-2/3 in. by 1/2 in. annular)

0.022-0.027

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (2-2/3 in. by 1/2 in. helical)

0.011-0.023

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (6 in. by 1 in. helical)

0.022-0.025

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (5 in. by 1 in. helical)

0.025–0.026

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (3 in. by 1 in. helical)

0.027–0.028

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (6 in. by 2 in. structural plate)

0.033–0.035

Corrugated-metal pipe -- (9 in. by 2-1/2 in. structural plate)

0.033–0.037

Corrugated polyethylene

0.010–0.013

 

Smooth

0.009-0.015

 

Corrugated

0.018–0.025

Spiral rib metal pipe (smooth)

0.012-0.013

Vitrified clay

 

 

Pipes

0.011-0.015

 

Liner plates

0.013-0.017

Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (smooth)

0.009-0.011

Table 4-9 note: Manning’s n for corrugated pipes is a function of the corrugation size, pipe size, and whether the corrugations are annular or helical (see USGS 1993).



Previous page  Next page   Title page