Anchor: #CHDBIDFH

Section 2: Utility Property Ownership

Anchor: #i1003635

Public Utility Easement (PUE) Reimbursement Considerations

PUEs are rights obtained by an LPA when property is platted or re-platted for development. Right of way is reserved to accommodate utility access to the development. This right of way is intended for use of all utilities, and therefore conveys a compensable interest to any utility placed within the easement. However, the PUE does not convey a replacement right of way interest to any occupants of the PUE. The Texas 14th Court of Appeals ruled that utilities should be reimbursed for costs directly attributable to work performed in a PUE.

All utilities within a PUE have compensable rights if any portion of the easement were to be incorporated into the proposed right of way limits of a transportation project. The incorporated portion gives the utilities within that portion the right to request TxDOT cost participation in any adjustment to those specific facilities.

In this case, utilities are required to execute a Utility Joint Use Acknowledgement. The utilities located within the easement would be eligible for costs to relocate or adjust their facilities on a one-time basis, and would not be eligible to retain any future compensable rights.

Anchor: #i1003667

Acquisition of Right of Way from a Utility Property Owner

If a utility owns fee title to property required for a proposed right of way project, it is TxDOT’s preferred practice to acquire fee title to that property. If the facilities or operations of a public utility are affected on the required right of way, the facilities will be eligible for State cost participation. This cost participation will be in accordance with the appropriate Standard Utility Agreement and the Utility Joint Use Acknowledgement.

Anchor: #i1003681

Compensation Considerations

A utility easement is a specific right to a legally described parcel of land that has been, or can be, recorded in the Real Property Records of the county.

In some situations, a property interest may not be possessed by a utility, but eligibility for State cost participation may be appropriate to compensate for the required adjustment. Compensation consideration may be appropriate for a railroad license agreement in favor of a utility predating a public right of way, or a joint occupancy agreement between two separate utilities (typically occupying poles) if the primary utility (typically pole owner) holds a property interest.

Occasionally, a utility will occupy, by statutory authority, areas covered by the property rights of another entity. This does not entitle the utility to retain any compensable right or to purchase replacement rights if acquisition of the area becomes necessary for a transportation project. However, the utility is entitled to reimbursement of a compensable cost to adjust its facilities on a one-time basis.

TxDOT can recognize a local municipality’s property interest if TxDOT sees a benefit and local funds are not available.

In addition, to enhancing public relations between local communities and TxDOT, the advantages to this approach are that:

    Anchor: #EIWLNDJW
  • minimal documentation would be required under 23CFR 645.103d;
  • Anchor: #LTNRGLPS
  • any delays or stoppages due to lack of municipal funding would be avoided; and decreases in SIB utility loan requests, non-complying utility accommodations (with attendant legal issues), and contractor claims would be realized.

If questions arise regarding the status of rights claimed by a utility, that utility is responsible for documentation of these rights. TxDOT reviews property rights claimed by the utility to determine if a compensation consideration or a property right exists before making an agreement to adjust the utility’s facilities.

For a utility agreement assembly to be a candidate for approval, the utility’s compensation consideration must be clearly documented and supported by verifiable evidence, such as a recorded deed, easement, lease or Form ROW-U-84. In situations where evidence of property interest is inadequate to support compensability, compensation consideration issues must be resolved before District approval of the utility agreement assembly.

The District may request pre-approval of the compensation consideration claim in writing. The request may include submission of the completed affidavits ROW-U-1A, ROW-U-1B, or ROW-U-1C, as appropriate, to support the property interest claim. ROW Division will review the District request and reply in writing with comments and/or approval.

License agreements with a railroad that document a compensation consideration for a utility must have been executed before the highway facility was constructed. Otherwise, no compensation consideration can be acknowledged.

When municipally owned utilities are located in a city street where no previous adjustment has been performed and later becomes part of the State Highway System, a current project requiring adjustment of those municipally owned utilities may be deemed reimbursable by the State.

Anchor: #i1003774

Eligibility Ratio

Eligibility for reimbursement of utility adjustment costs must be clearly identified. The District may seek pre-approval of the eligibility ratio from ROW Division and continue processing the utility agreement assembly for approval. Eligibility issues must be resolved before District approval of the utility agreement assembly.

Scenarios of eligibility, including eligibility ratios, are available in PDF format. The eligibility ratios found on these scenarios are based primarily upon proportional property rights as measured along the centerline of the existing utility facility. When the conflict lies solely within the joint use/acquisition of the utility’s property, the eligibility ratio is 100%. Scenarios are available in PDF format. Each example scenario shows the appropriate eligibility ratio.

For example, if it is assumed that the total width of the proposed highway right of way is 300-feet, and 100-feet of the utility’s existing facility is presently located on highway right of way by statutory right, and 200 feet is presently occupying utility right of way (or utility easement), then TxDOT will participate in 67% (200’/300’) of the total cost of the required adjustment after deducting any credits due for betterment and salvage.

The key determining factors for eligibility ratio are:

    Anchor: #DMJOQDVB
  • line length for underground pipelines and cables, and
  • Anchor: #GLYIMESP
  • main line pole location for power and overhead communication facilities. Guy poles, push braces, and down guys must be excluded from the ratio as these items are considered as supporting structures.

In developing the ratio, line length or number of poles is restricted to facilities located within the existing and proposed highway right of way. Facilities located outside the existing and proposed right of way limits will not be used in developing the ratio. However, the percentage established from the ratio will be applied to all applicable costs necessary for the adjustment.

All applicable adjustment costs will be ineligible for TxDOT cost participation when line poles are on highway right of way by statutory right, and guy poles, push braces and/or down guys are on utility-owned right of way. However, TxDOT will participate in right of way costs incurred in conjunction with adjustment of the guy poles, push braces, and/or down guys. The basis for developing the ratio for underground pipelines, cables, overhead power and communication facilities is as follows:

Although line lengths for pole line adjustments are not generally used as a basis for determining an eligibility ratio, special conditions (e.g., transmission towers, railroad intersections) may warrant consideration for such handling. When these conditions exist, all factual data must be submitted to the District for determination regarding the appropriate method of handling.

When there are facilities to be removed and not replaced, the establishment of an eligibility ratio must not include these facilities. Utility adjustment charges must be prorated only on those facilities being functionally replaced. For further information see Section 6.

The State’s participation must be limited to replacement-in-kind of the utility’s property interest, including length, width, and type.

Anchor: #i1003850

Calculating the Eligibility Ratio at Railroads

The eligibility ratio in the case of a license agreement between a railroad and a utility is determined by the following formula:

Width of the Existing Highway = 100’

Width of the Proposed Highway = 150’

Therefore, as an example, if the existing highway is 100 feet wide, and the proposed highway is 150 feet wide, then the eligibility ratio would be 33%.

Anchor: #i1003865

Composite Eligibility Ratios (CER)

On any given project, there may be multiple utility adjustments at different locations within the highway right of way project limits. When these different locations contain different line sizes and/or eligibility ratios, it will be necessary to calculate a CER. A CER is calculated to mitigate administrative and accounting difficulties encountered with simultaneous work sites having different individual eligibility ratios.

The formula for determining a CER is:

X+Y+Z

A+B+C

Where:

    Anchor: #NUOMMSYB
  • A= Cost of Adjustment of Utility “A”
  • Anchor: #BQSTBHBB
  • B= Cost of Adjustment of Utility “B”
  • Anchor: #LALYKBDA
  • C= Cost of Adjustment of Utility “C”
  • Anchor: #JDHJMMVS
  • X= “A” times the Eligibility Ratio for Utility “A”
  • Anchor: #VDLYCWNL
  • Y= “B” times the Eligibility Ratio for Utility “B”
  • Anchor: #PUMLIVUI
  • Z= “C” times the Eligibility Ratio for Utility “C.”
  • For example:

    Anchor: #i1002916Table 8-1: Composite Eligibility Ratio Calculation

    Facility to be adjusted

    Cost of Adjustment

    Individual Eligibility Ratio

    X, Y & Z Factors

    City Water Line – Location A

    $20,000

    100%

    X = $20,000

    City Sanitary Sewer

    $10,000

    50%

    Y = $5,000

    City Water Line – Location B

    $30,000

    75%

    Z = $22,500



    Therefore using the above example...

    20,000 + 5,000 + 22,500 = 47,500

    20,000 +10,000 + 30,000 = 60,000

    … the CER for this example would be 79.17%.

    The burden of proof regarding compensable interest lies with the utility company!

    When reviewing and approving the eligibility ratios, the District must consider appropriate affidavits and attachments.

Anchor: #i1003939

For State and LPA

The utility’s property interest can be supported either by the appropriate affidavits or ROW-U-84. Affidavits must be completed by the utility and furnished with the required attachments. The applicable form must be a part of the submission to the District in support of the adjustment. Refer to Affidavits for more information on affidavits of property ownership.

After execution of all agreements by the utility and the LPA, submit two copies of each of the following to the District:

The submission will be reviewed by the District to verify the following:

Previously assigned numbers must be placed in the appropriate spaces on the agreement if not done before execution by the utility. Signing of the agreements in the appropriate space will constitute the District Engineer’s approval.

Submit all copies of the foregoing materials to the District for review. If the submission is found acceptable, agreements will be processed for TxDOT approval. Approval of the agreements will establish an agreed lump sum amount for the adjustment.

Two originals of the approved agreement and supporting data will be returned to the District by the LPA for proper distribution, when applicable. The District must then forward one original copy of the approved agreement, along with a transmittal letter, to the utility and one original copy to ROW Division for record. The District’s letter must advise the LPA of the following:

    Anchor: #LCVPOSEA
  • to authorize the utility to proceed with the necessary adjustment
  • Anchor: #GAKSIFYW
  • that reimbursement in an amount of 90% of the approved lump sum amount in the agreement will be made after:

Coordination between the District and the LPA is essential since the desired timing of the adjustments is a TxDOT function. However, notification of utilities in respect to the approval of an agreement is the LPA’s responsibility.

Previous page  Next page   Title page